McKinstry v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

McKinstry v. Division of Employment Security

275 S.W.3d 387, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 135, 2009 WL 230596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 2009

DocketWD 69743

StatusPublished

This text of 275 S.W.3d 387 (McKinstry v. Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinstry v. Division of Employment Security, 275 S.W.3d 387, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 135, 2009 WL 230596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Patricia McKinstry appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that McKinstry was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, McKinstry claims that her violation of her employer’s attendance policy did not constitute misconduct. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Patricia McKinstry appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that McKinstry was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, McKinstry claims that her violation of her employer’s attendance policy did not constitute misconduct. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 S.W.3d 387, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 135, 2009 WL 230596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinstry-v-division-of-employment-security-moctapp-2009.