McKinnon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

McKinnon v. State

687 S.W.2d 849, 285 Ark. 483, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1955

DecidedApril 29, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 687 S.W.2d 849 (McKinnon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinnon v. State, 687 S.W.2d 849, 285 Ark. 483, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1955 (Ark. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Russell McKinnon, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Patricia Tucker, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Russell McKinnon, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Patricia Tucker, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 S.W.2d 849, 285 Ark. 483, 1985 Ark. LEXIS 1955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinnon-v-state-ark-1985.