McKinnon v. Horn

78 Miss. 307
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 Miss. 307 (McKinnon v. Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinnon v. Horn, 78 Miss. 307 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Horn and another, partners as Horn & Co., sued McKinnon on an open account before a j ustice of the peace. There were two mistrials before the justice of the peace. On the third call for trial, the defendant, McKinnon, was present demanding trial, but the plaintiffs were absent, and their suit was dis[308]*308missed by the coart a,t their costs. They appealed to the circuit court, which overruled McKinnon’s motion to dismiss, and this is assigned for error. It is insisted that Horn & Co. could not appeal, but that their only course was to sue again before the justice of the peace, because there was no trial on the merits. We cannot concur in this view. There was a final determination of that particular suit, and appeal was admissible. Gill v. Jones, 57 Miss., 367-370.

The verdict for Horn & Co. was • clearly right, and there is no error of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Solomon v. Continental Baking Co.
165 So. 607 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Johnson v. Johnston-Coutant Co.
4 Alaska 456 (D. Alaska, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Miss. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinnon-v-horn-miss-1900.