McKinnon v. . Faulk

68 N.C. 279
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 N.C. 279 (McKinnon v. . Faulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinnon v. . Faulk, 68 N.C. 279 (N.C. 1873).

Opinion

Settle, J.

The Courts of this State had grown very liberal under the old system of pleading in allowing amendments. And then the Constitution of 1868, at one blow, struck down the technicalities and refinements of the old system, and this has been followed up by the Code of Civil Procedure, which greatly enlarges the power of the Courts in respect to amendments-

Judges now have a very large discretion to make amendments in furtherance of justice. When they make or refuse to make amendments, ¿inder a mistake as to to their power, this Court will review their action, but when the matter lies within their discretion, this Court cannot review the exercise of that discretion.

Here the Court had the power to make the amendments of which the defendant complains; and by so doing removed his first objection to the jurisdiction.

There is no error.

Per, Curiam.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henderson v. . Graham
84 N.C. 496 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.C. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinnon-v-faulk-nc-1873.