McKinnies v. Stolzer

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedJanuary 3, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-00227
StatusUnknown

This text of McKinnies v. Stolzer (McKinnies v. Stolzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinnies v. Stolzer, (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

LAWTON MCKINNIES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:24-cv-00227-MTS ) SHERIFF GARY STOLZER, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Application of Self-Represented Plaintiff Lawton McKinnies’s Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Doc. [2]. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Ste. Genevieve County Jail. Having reviewed the Application and inmate account statement, the Court will grant the Application and assess an initial partial filing fee of twenty-four dollars and twenty cents ($24.20). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (explaining calculation of initial partial filing fee for prisoner litigants). Plaintiff shall pay the initial partial filing fee no later than Monday, February 17, 2025. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. See Walker v. Galbreth, 382 F. App’x 522 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to pay initial partial filing fee); In re Smith, 114 F.3d 1247, 1251 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (noting that, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the failure to pay the initial partial filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) may result in dismissal of a prisoner’s action (citing Ayo v. Bathey, 106 F.3d 98, 101 (Sth Cir. 1997) (per curiam))); see also Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 116 F.3d 1256, 1259 (8th Cir. 1997) (“A district court has the power to dismiss a litigant’s cause of action when the litigant fails to comply with the court’s orders.”’). After his initial payment, Plaintiff then will be required to make monthly payments in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until he pays the full $405 filing fee. See Ashley v. Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 716 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam) (explaining that prisoner- litigants must “pay filing fees in full, with the only issue being whether the inmate pays the entire filing fee at the initiation of the proceeding or in installments over a period of time”’); Wooten v. D.C. Metro. Police Dep’t, 129 F.3d 206, 207 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (explaining that “unlike other plaintiffs,” prisoners “always must pay tn full’). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, Doc. [2], is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of twenty-four dollars and twenty cents ($24.20) no later than Monday, February 17, 2025. Plaintiff shall make his remittance payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement that the remittance is for an original proceeding. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. Dated this 3rd day of January 2025. |) | oo uh UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Peter C. Smith
114 F.3d 1247 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)
Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
116 F.3d 1256 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Ayo v. Bathey
106 F.3d 98 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McKinnies v. Stolzer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinnies-v-stolzer-moed-2025.