McKinney's Estate

103 A. 590, 260 Pa. 123, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 479
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1918·No. Appeal, No. 170·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The trust estate created by the testatrix for her children is active, and they have but equitable life estates. The estates of the contingent remaindermen are legal, and, as the quality of these two estates is not the same, the rule in Shelley’s Case has no application: Little v. Wilcox, 119 Pa. 439; Xander v. Easton Trust Company, 217 Pa. 485. The questions raised by the assignments [129]*129of error are properly, disposed of by tbe learned court below in its opinion dismissing tbe exceptions to tbe account of tbe trustee, and, on it, this appeal is dismissed, at tbe costs of tbe appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinney's Estate, 103 A. 590, 260 Pa. 123, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 479 (Pa. 1918).

103 A. 590 (McKinney's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney Estate
258 A.2d 632 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1969)
Forsyth's Estate
6 A.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Schulze v. Schulze Dyeing Co.
22 Pa. D. & C. 625 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Field's Estate
109 A. 677 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)