McKinney v. Virginia

548 F. App'x 80
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 2013
DocketNo. 13-2080
StatusPublished

This text of 548 F. App'x 80 (McKinney v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinney v. Virginia, 548 F. App'x 80 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Don W. McKinney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKinney v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 2:12-cv-00032-JPJ-PMS (WD.Va. July 31, 2013). We deny McKinney’s pending motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-virginia-ca4-2013.