McKinney v. Target Corporation
This text of McKinney v. Target Corporation (McKinney v. Target Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants have agreed that Plaintiff suffered a compensable injury to her head and neck on November 28, 2009. Dr. Anthony Wheeler, Plaintiff's authorized treating physician, believes that Plaintiff's right shoulder pain may be related to her compensable neck injury and has requested an MRI of her right shoulder to confirm his assessment in order to "refine" his treatment plan for Plaintiff's compensable injury. Defendants have denied that Plaintiff's right shoulder condition is causally related to her compensable injury and for this reason have denied authorization of the MRI. *Page 2
The Full Commission concludes that the MRI requested by Dr. Wheeler is reasonably necessary for the development or refinement of his treatment plan for Plaintiff's admittedly compensable neck injury. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants shall authorize an MRI of Plaintiff's right shoulder.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Deputy Commissioner level for an expedited hearing on the issue of whether Plaintiff's right shoulder symptoms are causally related to her compensable injury.
This the 30th day of November 2011.
S/_____________________ BERNADINE S. BALLANCE COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
*Page 1S/_______________ DANNY L. McDONALD COMMISSIONER
S/_______________ TAMMY R. NANCE COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McKinney v. Target Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-target-corporation-ncworkcompcom-2011.