McKinney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McKinney v. State

67 S.W.2d 1116, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 872

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKinney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. Crim. 508 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 10, 1934·No. No. 16374·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding.Judge.

The unlawful transportation -of intoxicating liquor-is the-offense;, penalty .assessed-at confinement in the penitentiary for ope year.

The indictment seems regular and properly presented. It is sufficient to chdrge the offense. The evidence -heard upon the- trial' is not before this court. Nothing has been pointed out or discovered .that would warrant interference with the judgment and sentence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding.Judge.

The unlawful transportation -of intoxicating liquor-is the-offense;, penalty .assessed-at confinement in the penitentiary for ope year.

The indictment seems regular and properly presented. It is sufficient to chdrge the offense. The evidence -heard upon the- trial' is not before this court. Nothing has been pointed out or discovered .that would warrant interference with the judgment and sentence.

The judgment is affirmed.

McKinney v. State, 67 S.W.2d 1116, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 872 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

67 S.W.2d 1116 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.