McKinney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McKinney v. State

67 S.W.2d 1116, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 872

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 10, 1934

DocketNo. 16374

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.W.2d 1116 (McKinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. State, 67 S.W.2d 1116, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 872 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding.Judge.

The unlawful transportation -of intoxicating liquor-is the-offense;, penalty .assessed-at confinement in the penitentiary for ope year.

The indictment seems regular and properly presented. It is sufficient to chdrge the offense. The evidence -heard upon the- trial' is not before this court. Nothing has been pointed out or discovered .that would warrant interference with the judgment and sentence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding.Judge.

The unlawful transportation -of intoxicating liquor-is the-offense;, penalty .assessed-at confinement in the penitentiary for ope year.

The indictment seems regular and properly presented. It is sufficient to chdrge the offense. The evidence -heard upon the- trial' is not before this court. Nothing has been pointed out or discovered .that would warrant interference with the judgment and sentence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W.2d 1116, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.