McKinney v. State

587 S.E.2d 762, 263 Ga. App. 295, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2584, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKinney v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 Ga. App. 12
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 21, 2003·No. A03A1405·Published

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

Acting pro se, Larry McKinney appeals from the denial of his out-of-time motion to correct an illegal sentence. McKinney complains that he was improperly sentenced as a recidivist and that he [296]*296was not provided a list of witnesses prior to trial. However, as McKinney failed to raise these claims at the time he appealed his conviction (see generally McKinney v. State, 251 Ga. App. 896 (555 SE2d 468) (2001)), he has waived them. “[H]aving once invoked the appellate process, [McKinney] cannot now seek to raise issues which should have been raised in that appeal.” (Citations, punctuation and footnotes omitted.) Taylor v. State, 261 Ga. App. 248, 249 (1) (582 SE2d 209) (2003).

Decided August 21, 2003 Reconsideration dismissed September 19,2003. Larry McKinney, pro se. Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, Cheri L. Nichols, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith, C. J., and Ruffin, R J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinney v. State, 587 S.E.2d 762, 263 Ga. App. 295, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2584, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 1046 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

587 S.E.2d 762 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. State
555 S.E.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Taylor v. State
582 S.E.2d 209 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)