McKinney v. State
This text of 93 S.E. 510 (McKinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The several excerpts from the charge of the court which are assigned as error in the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without substantial merit. The charge of the court, considered as a whole, was full and fair, and is not subject to the criticism that it was argumentative and unduly emphasized the contentions of the State.
2. The evidence is sufficient to warrant the verdict finding the defendant guilty of the offense of assault with intent to rape, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. This court is without power to interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 510, 20 Ga. App. 821, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-state-gactapp-1917.