McKinney v. State

229 So. 3d 414
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 20, 2017
DocketNo. 3D17-1703
StatusPublished

This text of 229 So. 3d 414 (McKinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinney v. State, 229 So. 3d 414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Minor v. State, 707 So.2d 1184, 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (finding that the defendant’s conviction for the lesser included offense of manslaughter with a firearm was subject to reclassification as a first-degree felony under section 775.087(1) of the Florida Statutes where a firearm was used “[bjecause the use of a weapon or firearm is not an element of the offense of manslaughter”); see also Roberts v. State, 923 So.2d 578, 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“[I]t is clear that there is no double jeopardy prohibition against applying a habitual offender enhancement to a felony already reclassified under section 775.087(1).”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minor v. State
707 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Roberts v. State
923 So. 2d 578 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 So. 3d 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.