McKinney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McKinney v. State

751 So. 2d 766, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1978, 2000 WL 228063

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2000·No. No. 1D98-2395·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appealed orders are affirmed. As in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999), we certify the following question of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appealed orders are affirmed. As in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. granted, 740 So.2d 529 (Fla.1999), we certify the following question of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

McKinney v. State, 751 So. 2d 766, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1978, 2000 WL 228063 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

751 So. 2d 766 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related