McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

S.D. Alabama

McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

DecidedAugust 23, 2022

Docket1:21-cv-00414

StatusUnknown

This text of McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, (S.D. Ala. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT MCKINNEY and ) EVANGELINE MCKINNEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 21-00414-KD-N ) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Partial Dismissal (Doc. 37), through which all parties seek dismissal of Plaintiffs’ allegations of bad faith against Defendant, as found in Count II of the Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a). Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to dismiss a certain count of the Complaint while permitting the other count to remain. (Doc. 37). However, Dismissal is not the proper vehicle for such relief. The Eleventh Circuit has explained that when a plaintiff seeks to dismiss a claim, but not the cause of action, the proper procedure is through a motion to amend the complaint. Campbell v. Altec Indus., Inc., 605 F.3d 839, 841 at note 1 (11th Cir. 2010). “Circuit precedent dictates that Rule 41 allows a plaintiff to dismiss all of his claims against a particular defendant; its text does not permit plaintiffs to pick and choose, dismissing only particular claims within an action. 'A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss under Rule 41(a)[]'”). Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004). Thus, for plaintiffs to “eliminate particular claims or issues from the action,” they “should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a)[.]” Id. Rule 15(a)(2)1 provides that Plaintiffs may amend their pleadings “only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave[]” and the “court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Id. See also Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Because all

parties have signed the stipulation and stipulate in writing to the relief sought in same, the Court will construe Doc. 37 as Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to amend their Complaint to exclude their allegations of bad faith against the Defendant, as contained in Count II. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file, on or before September 2, 2022, an amended complaint (amending to exclude their allegations of bad faith, as contained in Count II). DONE and ORDERED this the 23rd day of August 2022. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 A review of the docket indicates that the Rule 15(a)(1) deadlines do not apply (i.e., the parties are beyond the "21 days" deadlines).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT MCKINNEY and ) EVANGELINE MCKINNEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 21-00414-KD-N ) STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Partial Dismissal (Doc. 37), through which all parties seek dismissal of Plaintiffs’ allegations of bad faith against Defendant, as found in Count II of the Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a). Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to dismiss a certain count of the Complaint while permitting the other count to remain. (Doc. 37). However, Dismissal is not the proper vehicle for such relief. The Eleventh Circuit has explained that when a plaintiff seeks to dismiss a claim, but not the cause of action, the proper procedure is through a motion to amend the complaint. Campbell v. Altec Indus., Inc., 605 F.3d 839, 841 at note 1 (11th Cir. 2010). “Circuit precedent dictates that Rule 41 allows a plaintiff to dismiss all of his claims against a particular defendant; its text does not permit plaintiffs to pick and choose, dismissing only particular claims within an action. 'A plaintiff wishing to eliminate particular claims or issues from the action should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a) rather than dismiss under Rule 41(a)[]'”). Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc., 376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004). Thus, for plaintiffs to “eliminate particular claims or issues from the action,” they “should amend the complaint under Rule 15(a)[.]” Id. Rule 15(a)(2)1 provides that Plaintiffs may amend their pleadings “only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave[]” and the “court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Id. See also Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). Because all

parties have signed the stipulation and stipulate in writing to the relief sought in same, the Court will construe Doc. 37 as Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for leave to amend their Complaint to exclude their allegations of bad faith against the Defendant, as contained in Count II. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file, on or before September 2, 2022, an amended complaint (amending to exclude their allegations of bad faith, as contained in Count II). DONE and ORDERED this the 23rd day of August 2022. /s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 A review of the docket indicates that the Rule 15(a)(1) deadlines do not apply (i.e., the parties are beyond the "21 days" deadlines).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

McKinney v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company-alsd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack