McKinney v. State
This text of 141 So. 706 (McKinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.
*8 We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 So. 706, 225 Ala. 7, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-state-ala-1932.