McKinney v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

McKinney v. State

141 So. 706, 225 Ala. 7, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 337

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 12, 1932·No. 6 Div. 148.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.

*8 We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARDNER, J.

We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.

*8 We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

McKinney v. State, 141 So. 706, 225 Ala. 7, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 337 (Ala. 1932).

Pincite

141 So. 706 (McKinney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related