Mckinney v. Pate

994 F.2d 772, 1993 WL 209679
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 17, 1993·No. No. 91-3416·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVTICH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mckinney v. Pate, 994 F.2d 772, 1993 WL 209679 (11th Cir. 1993).

994 F.2d 772 (Mckinney v. Pate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKinney v. Pate
20 F.3d 1550 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Hunter v. City of Warner Robins, Ga.
842 F. Supp. 1460 (M.D. Georgia, 1994)