McKinney v. O'HARE

Missouri Court of Appeals

McKinney v. O'HARE

212 S.W.3d 172, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2007 WL 152019

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 23, 2007

DocketED 86063

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 S.W.3d 172 (McKinney v. O'HARE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. O'HARE, 212 S.W.3d 172, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2007 WL 152019 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara McKinney and Donald Bowden appeal an adverse jury verdict rendered in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in favor of Michael O’Hare. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara McKinney and Donald Bowden appeal an adverse jury verdict rendered in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis in favor of Michael O’Hare. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 S.W.3d 172, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 122, 2007 WL 152019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-ohare-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack