McKinney v. Newcomb

New York Supreme Court

McKinney v. Newcomb

5 Cow. 425

New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1826·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Curia.

Here is no pretence of dishonesty or corruption in the arbitrators. We do not examine the merits on an application to set aside the award. (2 Archb. Pr. 289. 2 Burr. 701. 1 Str. 301. 1 Saund. 327, d.) A mere rais[426] take of the law is not a ground for our interference ; and js aq which is pretended. The case cited from the 17 Johnson was in a court of equity. The motion to set aside the award must be denied; and the attachment must go.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia.

Here is no pretence of dishonesty or corruption in the arbitrators. We do not examine the merits on an application to set aside the award. (2 Archb. Pr. 289. 2 Burr. 701. 1 Str. 301. 1 Saund. 327, d.) A mere rais[426] take of the law is not a ground for our interference ; and js aq which is pretended. The case cited from the 17 Johnson was in a court of equity. The motion to set aside the award must be denied; and the attachment must go.

Rule accordingly.

McKinney v. Newcomb, 5 Cow. 425 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).

Pincite

5 Cow. 425 (McKinney v. Newcomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related