McKinney v. Morton

102 S.E.2d 449, 248 N.C. 101, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 339
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 26, 1958·Published

Opinion

PER Curiam.

Where, in a processioning proceeding, the only real controversy is as to the true location of the dividing line between the lands of the petitioners and of the respondents the cause should not be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535, 35 S.E. 2d 633; Brown v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 746, 55 S.E. 2d 498; Plemmons v. Cutshall, 234 N.C. 506, 67 S.E. 2d 501, under authority of which the judgment of voluntary nonsuit entered, below is hereby

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinney v. Morton, 102 S.E.2d 449, 248 N.C. 101, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 339 (N.C. 1958).

102 S.E.2d 449 (McKinney v. Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plemmons v. Cutshall
67 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Brown v. Hodges
55 S.E.2d 498 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Cornelison v. . Hammond
35 S.E.2d 633 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)