McKinney v. Morton
This text of 102 S.E.2d 449 (McKinney v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where, in a processioning proceeding, the only real controversy is as to the true location of the dividing line between the lands of the petitioners and of the respondents the cause should not be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535, 35 S.E. 2d 633; Brown v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 746, 55 S.E. 2d 498; Plemmons v. Cutshall, 234 N.C. 506, 67 S.E. 2d 501, under authority of which the judgment of voluntary nonsuit entered, below is hereby
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E.2d 449, 248 N.C. 101, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-morton-nc-1958.