McKinney v. McKinney

215 S.W. 34, 185 Ky. 315, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 292
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 10, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 215 S.W. 34 (McKinney v. McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinney v. McKinney, 215 S.W. 34, 185 Ky. 315, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 292 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Christine McKinney sued her husband, T. D. McKinney, for divorce and alimony. He counterclaimed for divorce on the ground that she was guilty of such lewd and lascivious behavior as proved her to be unchaste. On final hearing’ the chancellor held that the charge of unchastity was not sustained by the evidence, but that plaintiff’s ground of divorce was fully established, and entered a decree giving plaintiff a divorce and awarding her alimony in the sum of $2,000.00. Defendant appeals.

While we have no power to reverse the decree of divorce, we may, as we are asked to do, review the correctness of the decree for the purpose of determining whether or not alimony was properly awarded. Caudill v. Caudill, 172 Ky. 460, 189 S. W. 431. It would serve no good purpose to detail the evidence. The case turns on the credibility of the witnesses. Since the chancellor was on the ground and knew the parties and their witnesses, he was in a better position than we are to determine what effect should be given to the testimony, and after a careful consideration of the testimony, we see no reason for disturbing his finding.

Defendant’s testimony as to how much property he had was very evasive. It is certain that he had at least $2,000.00, and probably several hundred dollars in excess of that. In addition to this, it was shown that he was a [316]*316railway mail clerk and received a salary of $1,500.00 a year. Under these circumstances, alimony in the sum of $2,000.00 was not excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skidmore v. Skidmore
87 S.W.2d 631 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Ramey v. Ramey
6 S.W.2d 470 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 S.W. 34, 185 Ky. 315, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-mckinney-kyctapp-1919.