McKinney v. Mailroom Officer

CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii
DecidedOctober 26, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-00432
StatusUnknown

This text of McKinney v. Mailroom Officer (McKinney v. Mailroom Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Hawaii primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinney v. Mailroom Officer, (D. Haw. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII KEITH MCKINNEY, CIVIL NO. 23-00432 DKW-KJM #A6034607, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY A PRISONER v.

MAILROOM OFFICER, et al.,

Defendants.

Before the Court is an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner filed by pro se Plaintiff Keith McKinney.1 ECF No. 2. McKinney’s IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete because it does not include the required trust fund account statements. When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an (1) affidavit of indigence and (2) a certified copy of the inmate’s trust account

1McKinney states that he is currently incarcerated at the Halawa Correctional Facility. See ECF No. 1 at PageID.1. statement for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir. 2000). A prisoner

must submit trust account statements from each institution where he was confined during the relevant six-month period. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). To assist prisoners in meeting these statutory requirements, the Court

requires use of a form application—that is, the “Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner.” See United States District Court District of Hawaii, https://www.hid.uscourts.gov/files/prose/Application%20To%20Proceed%20In%2 0Forma%20Pauperis%20By%20a%20Prisoner%20(IFP)%20and%20Instructions.p

df (last visited October 26, 2023). This form includes: (1) an affidavit of indigence (for completion by the prisoner); (2) a financial certificate and consent to collection of fees (for completion by the prisoner); and (3) a certificate (for

completion by the warden or other appropriate officer of the institution in which the prisoner is confined). See id. The form also reminds the prison official to attach a copy of the prisoner’s trust account balance statements for the preceding six months. See id.

If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of twenty percent of either the average monthly deposits or the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account, whichever is

greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016). An initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly

payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account, each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84. These payments continue until the filing fee

is paid in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The initial partial filing fee and the subsequent monthly installment payments are assessed on a per-case basis. Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84. Thus, filing fees associated with multiple actions are recouped simultaneously, not sequentially. See id.

McKinney’s IFP Application is incomplete because it does not include account statements for the preceding six months showing all deposits and withdrawals to McKinney’s account during that period. See ECF No. 2.

According to McKinney, he is currently incarcerated at the Halawa Correctional Facility. See ECF No. 1 at PageID.1. In the Complaint, McKinney makes allegations based on the handling of his mail between May 1, 2023, and October 7, 2023, while he was an inmate at the Kulani Correctional Facility in

Hilo, Hawaiʻi. See ECF No. 1. McKinney is reminded, therefore, that he must submit account statements from each institution where he was confined during the six months prior to the filing of this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) (stating

that an inmate must provide an account statement “for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint . . . obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined”

(emphasis added)); see also See Jones v. Corr. Corp. of Am., No. 10-3009-SAC, 2010 WL 571949, at *1 (D. Kan. Feb. 12, 2010) (“[I]f [the plaintiff] was confined in another jail or prison during the six months preceding the filing of this action, it

was his responsibility to obtain and provide copies of his inmate account statements from those other institutions.”); Jackson v. Grondolsky, Civil Action No. 09-1112 (NLH), 2009 WL 2496511, at *2 (D.N.J. Aug. 11, 2009) (“The prisoner must obtain this certified statement from the appropriate official of each

prison at which he was or is confined. (emphasis added)). McKinney is DIRECTED to submit a complete IFP Application that includes account statements from appropriate officials at each prison where he was

confined during the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this action. Failure to do so, or to pay the filing fee in full, by November 17, 2023 will result in automatic dismissal of this suit without prejudice and without further notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112

(9th Cir. 1995). The Court will take no action on any pending or future filings in this action until McKinney addresses the deficiencies set forth in this Order. CONCLUSION (1) McKinney’ Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner is DENIED without prejudice as incomplete. (2) McKinney is DIRECTED to pay the filing fee in full, or to submit a complete IFP Application by November 17, 2023. (3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send McKinney an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner to facilitate compliance with this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 26, 2023 at Honolulu, Hawai‘i.

S.@.% 1 We ne Derrick K. Watson Ran i LS Chief United States District Judge

Keith McKinney v. Mailroom Officer, et al.; Civil No. 23-00432 DK W-KJM; ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY A PRISONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce v. Samuels
577 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Olivares v. Marshall
59 F.3d 109 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McKinney v. Mailroom Officer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-mailroom-officer-hid-2023.