McKinney v. Kline Oldsmobile, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

McKinney v. Kline Oldsmobile, Inc.

244 N.W.2d 163, 309 Minn. 576, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1595

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 16, 1976

DocketNo. 46183

StatusPublished

This text of 244 N.W.2d 163 (McKinney v. Kline Oldsmobile, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. Kline Oldsmobile, Inc., 244 N.W.2d 163, 309 Minn. 576, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1595 (Mich. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On certiorari the employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding benefits to the employee for permanent and total disability. While there was a dispute in the opinions of the expert medical witnesses as to the causal relationship between occupational exposure to toxic fumes and the employee’s disabling histiocytic lymphoma and pulmonary fibrosis, the compensation board as factfinder resolved this disagreement in the employee’s favor. The board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted.

Attorneys fees in the amount of $350 are allowed respondent on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On certiorari the employer and insurer seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding benefits to the employee for permanent and total disability. While there was a dispute in the opinions of the expert medical witnesses as to the causal relationship between occupational exposure to toxic fumes and the employee’s disabling histiocytic lymphoma and pulmonary fibrosis, the compensation board as factfinder resolved this disagreement in the employee’s favor. The board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted.

Attorneys fees in the amount of $350 are allowed respondent on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 N.W.2d 163, 309 Minn. 576, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-kline-oldsmobile-inc-minn-1976.