McKinney v. Hertz Corp.
This text of 489 So. 2d 230 (McKinney v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the context of this workers’ compensation proceeding, the evidence presented by claimant was sufficient to shift the burden to the employer and carrier to establish that the medical bills had been paid within the statutory period. The employer and carrier failed to carry that burden. Therefore, the order denying an attorney’s fee is [231]*231reversed and the case is remanded for award of an attorney’s fee to claimant,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 So. 2d 230, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1278, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-hertz-corp-fladistctapp-1986.