McKinney v. Earls

Fourth Circuit

McKinney v. Earls

122 F. App'x 36

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2005·No. No. 04-1837·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Don McKinney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKinney v. Earls, No. CA-03-153-2 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2004). We deny McKinney’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Don McKinney appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKinney v. Earls, No. CA-03-153-2 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2004). We deny McKinney’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McKinney v. Earls, 122 F. App'x 36 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

122 F. App'x 36 (McKinney v. Earls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.