McKinney v. Doherty
This text of 23 F. App'x 190 (McKinney v. Doherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William Clayton McKinney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McKinney v. Doherty, No. CA-00-3971-6-20AK (D.S.C. Sept. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *191 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F. App'x 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-doherty-ca4-2002.