McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc.

184 So. 2d 644, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3799

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 1966

DocketNo. 34895

StatusPublished

This text of 184 So. 2d 644 (McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. Deel Motors, Inc., 184 So. 2d 644, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3799 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 11, 1965. No oral argument was requested or heard, and after consideration of the petition, the record and briefs, we conclude the petition should be, and it is, hereby denied.

Petitioner failed to comply with Rule 6 of the Rules of Procedure and the provisions of F.S. Section 440.25(4) (b) F.S.A. promulgated for the orderly dispatch of workmen’s compensation cases. Cf. Schneider v. Gustafson Industries, Inc. (Fla.1962), 139 So.2d 423; and General Accident Group v. Lieber (Fla.1962), 146 So.2d 896.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI