McKinney v. Chapman

934 A.2d 243, 284 Conn. 928, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 448

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 16, 2007·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 446 (AC 27579), is denied.

*929 Decided October 16, 2007 W. Martyn Philpot, Jr., in support of the petition. David C. Nelson, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

ROGERS, C. J., and SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 446 (AC 27579), is denied.

*929 Decided October 16, 2007 W. Martyn Philpot, Jr., in support of the petition. David C. Nelson, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

ROGERS, C. J., and SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

McKinney v. Chapman, 934 A.2d 243, 284 Conn. 928, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 448 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

934 A.2d 243 (McKinney v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.