McKinney v. Carter

New York Supreme Court

McKinney v. Carter

56 Misc. 2d 67, 288 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3418

DecidedFebruary 8, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Misc. 2d 67 (McKinney v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. Carter, 56 Misc. 2d 67, 288 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3418 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell G. Hunt, J.

It is stated that this is an application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, but the petitioner limits what is to be reviewed. It is stated that what the petitioner does [68]*68not like is a statement contained in a report of an informal investigation by the respondent commission ‘ ‘ of the State University College of Education at New Paltz” respecting possible discrimination “ on the basis of race.” In that report and in a statement by the respondent ‘ ‘ for release in a.m. papers, Tuesday, November 1 and thereafter ” it was said, along with a statement that there was no basis for a charge of bias, that the College of Education at New Paltz was “ Located in a community where the shadows of an era of racial intolerance and religious bigotry have not wholly vanished, the institution has moved steadily toward the attainment of the democratic ideal.”

The statement objected to is not expressive of a determination or direction which is reviewable in an article 78 proceeding; therefore, the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell G. Hunt, J.

It is stated that this is an application under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, but the petitioner limits what is to be reviewed. It is stated that what the petitioner does [68]*68not like is a statement contained in a report of an informal investigation by the respondent commission ‘ ‘ of the State University College of Education at New Paltz” respecting possible discrimination “ on the basis of race.” In that report and in a statement by the respondent ‘ ‘ for release in a.m. papers, Tuesday, November 1 and thereafter ” it was said, along with a statement that there was no basis for a charge of bias, that the College of Education at New Paltz was “ Located in a community where the shadows of an era of racial intolerance and religious bigotry have not wholly vanished, the institution has moved steadily toward the attainment of the democratic ideal.”

The statement objected to is not expressive of a determination or direction which is reviewable in an article 78 proceeding; therefore, the application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Misc. 2d 67, 288 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-carter-nysupct-1961.