McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

41 F. App'x 19

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2002·No. No. 02-1258·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity tort action, attorney Joey McCutchen appeals from the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment as to his Arkansas attorney-lien claim. See Ark.Code Ann. § 16-22-304 (Michie 1999). Upon de novo review, see [20]*20First Bank of Marietta v. Hogge, 161 F.3d 506, 510 (8th Cir.1998), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this diversity tort action, attorney Joey McCutchen appeals from the district court’s ¹ adverse grant of summary judgment as to his Arkansas attorney-lien claim. See Ark.Code Ann. § 16-22-304 (Michie 1999). Upon de novo review, see [20]*20First Bank of Marietta v. Hogge, 161 F.3d 506, 510 (8th Cir.1998), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 41 F. App'x 19 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 19 (McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related