McKinney v. Bradlee

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

McKinney v. Bradlee

117 Mass. 321, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 226

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 22, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 117 Mass. 321 (McKinney v. Bradlee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinney v. Bradlee, 117 Mass. 321, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 226 (Mass. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

There was no evidence of any other condition in the sale from the plaintiff to McDonald than that stated in the memorandum signed by the latter, which was that he should either pay the balance of the price at a future day or return the mare. The title therefore vested in McDonald by the sale and delivery to him, and whether it had or had not passed from him to the defendant, the plaintiff had no title. Dearborn v. Turner, 16 Maine, 17. Perkins v. Douglass, 20 Maine, 317.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray, C. J.

There was no evidence of any other condition in the sale from the plaintiff to McDonald than that stated in the memorandum signed by the latter, which was that he should either pay the balance of the price at a future day or return the mare. The title therefore vested in McDonald by the sale and delivery to him, and whether it had or had not passed from him to the defendant, the plaintiff had no title. Dearborn v. Turner, 16 Maine, 17. Perkins v. Douglass, 20 Maine, 317.

Judgment on the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 Mass. 321, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinney-v-bradlee-mass-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack