McKinney v. Bradlee
117 Mass. 321, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 226
Opinion
There was no evidence of any other condition in the sale from the plaintiff to McDonald than that stated in the memorandum signed by the latter, which was that he should either pay the balance of the price at a future day or return the mare. The title therefore vested in McDonald by the sale and delivery to him, and whether it had or had not passed from him to the defendant, the plaintiff had no title. Dearborn v. Turner, 16 Maine, 17. Perkins v. Douglass, 20 Maine, 317.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McKinney v. Bradlee, 117 Mass. 321, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 226 (Mass. 1875).
117 Mass. 321 (McKinney v. Bradlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Isaacs v. Macdonald
102 N.E. 81 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
In re Landis
151 F. 896 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1907)
Hadfield v. Berry
28 Ill. App. 376 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Hotchkiss v. Higgins
52 Conn. 205 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1884)