McKinney v. Board of Commissioners

179 S.E.2d 313, 278 N.C. 295, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 971
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 10, 1971·No. No. 25·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record shows no amendment of the plaintiff’s “Motion for Judgment” considered as a complaint. In it he sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from preparing for and holding the election which the Board of County Commissioners called to be held on 2 May 1970. He complains therein of no other action or proposed action. The election having been held, this appeal is moot and is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff, if so advised, to institute a new action for such relief as he may be entitled to have against any action taken or proposed to be taken by the defendants or others pursuant to the said election.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinney v. Board of Commissioners, 179 S.E.2d 313, 278 N.C. 295, 1971 N.C. LEXIS 971 (N.C. 1971).

179 S.E.2d 313 (McKinney v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClure v. County of Jackson
648 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)