McKinnedy v. Reynolds

181 L. Ed. 2d 4, 132 S. Ct. 375, 565 U.S. 804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6504, 80 U.S.L.W. 3192
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 3, 2011·No. No. 10-10921·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept [5]*5any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Same case below, 408 Fed. Appx. 707.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinnedy v. Reynolds, 181 L. Ed. 2d 4, 132 S. Ct. 375, 565 U.S. 804, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6504, 80 U.S.L.W. 3192 (U.S. 2011).

181 L. Ed. 2d 4 (McKinnedy v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)
McKinnedy v. Reynolds
408 F. App'x 707 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)