McKinnedy v. Reynolds

326 F. App'x 700
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKinnedy v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 973
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2009·No. 08-8499·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Clayton McKinnedy, III, seeks to appeal two orders: (1) the magistrate judge’s order denying McKinnedy’s motion for reconsideration of an earlier order denying his motion for recusal and (2) the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice McKinnedy’s claims against some but not all defendants. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders McKinnedy seeks to appeal are neither final orders *701 nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinnedy v. Reynolds, 326 F. App'x 700 (4th Cir. 2009).

326 F. App'x 700 (McKinnedy v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)