McKinley v. Roberts

287 P.3d 1179, 252 Or. App. 355, 2012 WL 4108008, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 19, 2012
Docket11C13099; A148264
StatusPublished

This text of 287 P.3d 1179 (McKinley v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKinley v. Roberts, 287 P.3d 1179, 252 Or. App. 355, 2012 WL 4108008, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, who is a patient in the Oregon State Hospital, sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is suffering health problems as a consequence of a poor ventilation system in the hospital. The trial court, on its own motion, dismissed plaintiffs petition for failure to state a claim for relief.

On appeal, plaintiff contends that this case is controlled by the Supreme Court’s decision in Bedell v. Scheidler, 307 Or 562, 570, 770 P2d 909 (1989), a case in which an inmate at a corrections center alleged that her constitutional rights had been violated because of inadequate ventilation and circulation of clean air at the facility. The inmate’s allegations, the court held, “established her right to a hearing at which she will have a full and fair opportunity to present her evidence.” Id.

Defendant, the superintendant of the hospital, concedes that plaintiff’s allegations are “virtually indistinguishable from the allegations that the Oregon Supreme Court held in Bedell required issuance of the writ,” and that the trial court therefore erred in sua sponte dismissing plaintiff’s petition. We agree, accept the concession of error, and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bedell v. Schiedler
770 P.2d 909 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 P.3d 1179, 252 Or. App. 355, 2012 WL 4108008, 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinley-v-roberts-orctapp-2012.