McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis

84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 370, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 51
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1920·No. 4 Div. 615.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The only assignment of error in this case is that the trial court erred in permitting the defendant’s counsel to ask the defendant, while testifying as a witness: “Did you have a rating in Bradstreet and Dun?” The objection was general, specifying no grounds. Where this is the case, unless the matter is clearly not proper for any purpose, the ruling of the trial- court will not be reversed. Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193, 7 South. 149; Eason, v. Isbell, 42 Ala. 456.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis, 84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 370, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 51 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

84 So. 858 (McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. City of Montgomery
337 So. 2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Thornton v. State
316 So. 2d 710 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Moulton v. State
98 So. 709 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)