McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis

Alabama Court of Appeals

McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis

84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 370, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 51

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1920

Docket4 Div. 615.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 84 So. 858 (McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKinley Music Co. v. Lewis, 84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 370, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 51 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The only assignment of error in this case is that the trial court erred in permitting the defendant’s counsel to ask the defendant, while testifying as a witness: “Did you have a rating in Bradstreet and Dun?” The objection was general, specifying no grounds. Where this is the case, unless the matter is clearly not proper for any purpose, the ruling of the trial- court will not be reversed. Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193, 7 South. 149; Eason, v. Isbell, 42 Ala. 456.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The only assignment of error in this case is that the trial court erred in permitting the defendant’s counsel to ask the defendant, while testifying as a witness: “Did you have a rating in Bradstreet and Dun?” The objection was general, specifying no grounds. Where this is the case, unless the matter is clearly not proper for any purpose, the ruling of the trial- court will not be reversed. Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193, 7 South. 149; Eason, v. Isbell, 42 Ala. 456.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 370, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckinley-music-co-v-lewis-alactapp-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack