McKinley ex rel. Orr v. Peters

3 A. 27, 111 Pa. 283, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 506
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1886·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was filed January 4th, 1886.

Per. Curiam.

The defendants, as tenants in common, owned the land on which the coal was mined. This fact, however, of itself, did not authorize Peters to enter into an agreement which would bind his co-tenant to sell to the plaintiff the unmined coal on the land. Peters had no authority either written or verbal from Lawrence to make the agreement in question. Not only did Peters 'make the agreement in the absence of authority from Lawrence, but the latter refused to sign it and never ratified it by receiving any portion of the royalty paid or otherwise. The learned Judge- was clearly right in instructing the jury to find for the defendants.

Judgment affirmed. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKinley ex rel. Orr v. Peters, 3 A. 27, 111 Pa. 283, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 506 (Pa. 1886).

3 A. 27 (McKinley ex rel. Orr v. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis, E. & J. v. Munda, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Lichtenfels v. Bridgeview Coal Co.
496 A.2d 782 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Wagman v. Carmel
601 F. Supp. 1012 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
Stein v. McGinley
186 A. 231 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Bernstein v. Colletris
99 Pa. Super. 484 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
McCullough's Petition
119 A. 585 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Wally v. Jones
119 A. 75 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Caveny v. Curtis
101 A. 853 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Adams v. Yukon Gold Co.
5 Alaska 391 (D. Alaska, 1915)
Leslie v. Leonard
10 Pa. Super. 548 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)