McKimm v. State

742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 208, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 1
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 13, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 S.W.2d 114 (McKimm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKimm v. State, 742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 208, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 1 (Ark. 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Raenita McKimm, by and through her attorneys, Hickam & Williams, P.A., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Her attorney, D. Scott Hickam, admits that the record was submitted late due to his miscalculation of the seven-month maximum limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. State
747 S.W.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 S.W.2d 114, 294 Ark. 208, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckimm-v-state-ark-1988.