McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company
55 N.E. 1097, 161 N.Y. 638, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1484
This text of 55 N.E. 1097 (McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company, 55 N.E. 1097, 161 N.Y. 638, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1484 (N.Y. 1900).
Opinion
These two appeals involve the same questions which were raised in the Kernochan Case (161 N. Y. 339), decided at the present term, and the judgments should be affirmed upon the opinion in that case, with costs.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., not sitting, and O’Brien, J., dissenting.
' affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kernochan v. . Manhattan Railway Co.
55 N.E. 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
55 N.E. 1097, 161 N.Y. 638, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckim-v-manhattan-railway-company-ny-1900.