McKim v. Imperial Irrigation District

255 P. 508, 201 Cal. 768, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 522
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McKim v. Imperial Irrigation District. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 Cal. 110
California Supreme Court·Decided April 22, 1927·No. Docket No. L.A. 9190.·Published

Opinion

[1] This appeal is from the identical judgment involved in the case of McKim v. Imperial Irrigation *Page 769 District et al., ante, p. 110 [255 P. 506], and is submitted upon the transcript and briefs filed in said case. The facts material to this appeal are set forth fully in the decision just referred to, and reference to the same will suffice here. The judgment appealed from having been reversed in the companion case, further consideration of it upon this appeal becomes unnecessary and the questions presented by appellant herein become moot.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Curtis, J., Preston, J., Richards, J., Waste, C.J., and Seawell, J., concurred.

Shenk, J., being disqualified, did not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKim v. Imperial Irrigation District, 255 P. 508, 201 Cal. 768, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 522 (Cal. 1927).

255 P. 508 (McKim v. Imperial Irrigation District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKim v. Imperial Irrigation District
255 P. 506 (California Supreme Court, 1927)