McKim v. Frobar Investment Co.

204 A.D.2d 609, 614 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), dated January 14, 1992, which, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint and dismissed the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents.

On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court’s charge to [610] the jury was erroneous and denied her a fair trial. However, none of the alleged errors are preserved for appellate review. In any event, the charge as a whole properly instructed the jury on the applicable principles of law (see, Fleischer v Melmarkets, Inc., 174 AD2d 647, 648; Timmons v Hecker, 110 AD2d 762) and, thus, provides no basis for a reversal of the verdict. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKim v. Frobar Investment Co., 204 A.D.2d 609, 614 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 609 (McKim v. Frobar Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Timmons v. Hecker
110 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Fleischer v. Melmarkets, Inc.
174 A.D.2d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)