McKiernan v. McKiernan
Opinion
—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 12, 1997, the plaintiff and his attorney appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated July 19, 1999, which, in effect, granted the motion of the plaintiffs attorney to vacate an order of the same court dated March 9, 1999, imposing a sanction in the sum of $10,000 pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 only to the extent of directing the plaintiffs attorney to pay $5,000 to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection.
Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as he is not aggrieved by the order appealed from; and it further,
Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the order dated March 9, 1999, is vacated.
The conduct of the attorney for the plaintiff was not frivolous as that term is defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) (see, Grier v Grier, 266 AD2d 345; Stow v Stow, 262 AD2d 550). Accordingly, the imposition of a sanction was improper. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
277 A.D.2d 434 (McKiernan v. McKiernan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.