McKiel v. Real Estate Bank

4 Ark. 592
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Ark. 592 (McKiel v. Real Estate Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKiel v. Real Estate Bank, 4 Ark. 592 (Ark. 1842).

Opinion

By the •Court,

Dickinson, J.

In regard to the plea of usury, it constitutes no defence, in this instance, as the act of 3d March, 1838, authorizes the defendant in error to charge the same rate of interest as the Bank of the State; and the interest, in this case, was calculated ■according to the provisions of that act. The judgment upon the demurrer was, therefore, right. The Bank, being a public corporation, was not required to be proved; as the court was bound judicially to take notice of it. It was not necessary to prove demand at the place of payment, as has been ruled by the court, in the case of Summer vs. Ford.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammett v. Little Rock & Napoleon Railroad
20 Ark. 204 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ark. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckiel-v-real-estate-bank-ark-1842.