McKewen v. Haddon

Mississippi Supreme Court

McKewen v. Haddon

87 So. 2d 94, 227 Miss. 866, 1956 Miss. LEXIS 765

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1956·No. No. 40173·Published

Opinion

Lee, J.

This controversy involved the location of a land line between the adjacent properties of the parties, in which a strip -approximately 25.5 feet wide was in question.

The learned chancellor, after hearing the evidence, oral and doucmentary, pro and con, went upon and viewed the property, and determined where the line should run between the disputants. His findings and decree are fully supported by substantial evidence; and it follows that the cause must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C.J., and Hall, Kyle and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee, J.

This controversy involved the location of a land line between the adjacent properties of the parties, in which a strip -approximately 25.5 feet wide was in question.

The learned chancellor, after hearing the evidence, oral and doucmentary, pro and con, went upon and viewed the property, and determined where the line should run between the disputants. His findings and decree are fully supported by substantial evidence; and it follows that the cause must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

McGehee, C.J., and Hall, Kyle and Ethridge, JJ., concur.

McKewen v. Haddon, 87 So. 2d 94, 227 Miss. 866, 1956 Miss. LEXIS 765 (Mich. 1956).

Pincite

87 So. 2d 94 (McKewen v. Haddon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.