McKesson Corp. v. TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MCKESSON CORPORATION, Case No. 2:24-cv-1225-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. NETWORK, INC., et al., 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 302(c)(19). On February 11, 2025, the Magistrate 20 Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties 21 and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations 22 were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 23 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See 24 Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s 25 conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 26 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 28 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and 1 | Recommendations in full. 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Proposed Findings and 3 | Recommendations (ECF No. 12) are ADOPTED; 4 1. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED; 5 2. Plaintiff is awarded $2,199,533.15 for its principal; 6 3. Within 21 days, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief limited to presenting a 7 modified request for prejudgment interest on Plaintiff's claims. Should Plaintiff 8 file a supplemental brief, Defendants may respond within 21 days after the 9 filing of Plaintiff's supplemental brief; 10 4. Plaintiff's award of final judgment is deferred until after a determination of 11 Plaintiff's prejudgment interest award can be made, which will be done by 12 further Findings and Recommendations. 13 14 IT 1S SO ORDERED. 15 | Dated: _March 25, 2025 Donel J CoD bra Hon. Daniel alabretta 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28