McKernan v. Connor

Indiana Supreme Court

McKernan v. Connor

15 Ind. 201, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 352

DecidedDecember 5, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 201 (McKernan v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKernan v. Connor, 15 Ind. 201, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 352 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs, sued Gonnor to recover of him certain commissions for the sale of real estate. Proper issues being made, the cause was submitted to the Court, who found for the defendants, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c.

The errors assigned are: 1. The finding of the Court is against the evidence; 2. The refusal to grant a new trial.

We have examined the evidence carefully, and are of the opinion that it fully sustains the finding of the Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs, sued Gonnor to recover of him certain commissions for the sale of real estate. Proper issues being made, the cause was submitted to the Court, who found for the defendants, and, having refused a new trial, rendered judgment, &c.

The errors assigned are: 1. The finding of the Court is against the evidence; 2. The refusal to grant a new trial.

We have examined the evidence carefully, and are of the opinion that it fully sustains the finding of the Court.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 201, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckernan-v-connor-ind-1860.