McKeown v. Beatty

California Supreme Court

McKeown v. Beatty

1 Cal. Unrep. 190

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 6, 1865

DocketNo. 430

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 190 (McKeown v. Beatty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKeown v. Beatty, 1 Cal. Unrep. 190 (Cal. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

SAWYER, J.

The contract upon which the judgment was entered having been executed before the passage of the acts of Congress, making treasury notes a legal tender in payment of debts, the only question is whether the judgment can be satisfied by payment in such treasury notes as are specified in said acts.

We have recently decided the question in the case of Higgins v. Bear River and Auburn Water and Mining Company, 27 Cal. 153. And on the authority of that ease the order appealed from is affirmed.

We concur: Currey, J.; Rhodes,'J.; Sanderson, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAWYER, J.

The contract upon which the judgment was entered having been executed before the passage of the acts of Congress, making treasury notes a legal tender in payment of debts, the only question is whether the judgment can be satisfied by payment in such treasury notes as are specified in said acts.

We have recently decided the question in the case of Higgins v. Bear River and Auburn Water and Mining Company, 27 Cal. 153. And on the authority of that ease the order appealed from is affirmed.

We concur: Currey, J.; Rhodes,'J.; Sanderson, C. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeown-v-beatty-cal-1865.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack