McKeown v. Bank for Savings

25 Misc. 797
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided December 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

Scotchman, J.

Under the authority of Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank, 16 Misc. Rep. 537, the order appealed from is right and is affirmed, with costs.

Olcott, J., concurs.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKeown v. Bank for Savings, 25 Misc. 797 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1898).

25 Misc. 797 (McKeown v. Bank for Savings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank
16 Misc. 537 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)