McKeon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McKeon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

262 A.D.2d 7, 690 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 7 (McKeon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKeon v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 262 A.D.2d 7, 690 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Ark, J., and a jury), entered June 22, 1998, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendants’ brief, awarding plaintiff, before apportionment, $810,000 for past pain and suffering and $540,000 for future pain and suffering over 17 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The awards for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate from what is reasonable compensation for plaintiff, a carpenter by trade, who had four fingers of his dominant hand fully amputated and reattached (cf., Leon v J & M Peppe Realty Corp., 190 AD2d 400, 415-416; Dauria v City of New York, 178 AD2d 289, lv denied 80 NY2d 751). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Ark, J., and a jury), entered June 22, 1998, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendants’ brief, awarding plaintiff, before apportionment, $810,000 for past pain and suffering and $540,000 for future pain and suffering over 17 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The awards for past and future pain and suffering do not deviate from what is reasonable compensation for plaintiff, a carpenter by trade, who had four fingers of his dominant hand fully amputated and reattached (cf., Leon v J & M Peppe Realty Corp., 190 AD2d 400, 415-416; Dauria v City of New York, 178 AD2d 289, lv denied 80 NY2d 751). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 7, 690 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckeon-v-sears-roebuck-co-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack