McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland

Ninth Circuit

McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland

35 F.4th 1218

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 2022

Docket19-72903

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 F.4th 1218 (McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland, 35 F.4th 1218 (9th Cir. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MCKENZY ALII ALFRED, No. 19-72903

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-565-401

v. ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI