McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland

35 F.4th 1218
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 3, 2022·No. 19-72903·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MCKENZY ALII ALFRED, No. 19-72903

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-565-401

v.

ORDER

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland, 35 F.4th 1218 (9th Cir. 2022).

35 F.4th 1218 (McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKenzy Alfred v. Merrick Garland
64 F.4th 1025 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
United States v. Danny Turner
47 F.4th 509 (Seventh Circuit, 2022)