McKenzie v. Sutton

198 S.W. 1012, 1917 WL 117
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 1917
DocketNo. 739.
StatusPublished

This text of 198 S.W. 1012 (McKenzie v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McKenzie v. Sutton, 198 S.W. 1012, 1917 WL 117 (Tex. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

This suit was brought by Eliza McKenzie against J. L. Sutton and Lucas McKenzie, a direct proceeding to set aside a judgment to cancel deed and remove cloud and for title to certain real estate. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and dismissed the suit.

The allegations of plaintiff’s petition are the same in form and as to facts, except as to parties and land sued for, as is shown in her suit No. 729 (McKenzie v. Frey, 198 S. W. 1009), this day handed down by this court, and the contentions of the parties in their briefs are the same as in that case. So for the reasons there assigned, this cause is reversed and remanded for trial upon its merits.

WALTHALL, J., not sitting, being absent on committee of judges assisting the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenzie v. Frey
198 S.W. 1009 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 S.W. 1012, 1917 WL 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mckenzie-v-sutton-texapp-1917.